Ticket #160 (closed planned: wontfix)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 23 months ago

reconsider naming of session::Clip and asset::Clip

Reported by: ichthyo Owned by: ichthyo
Priority: nice Milestone: 2beta
Component: lumieraProc Keywords: QA architecture data
Cc: Blocked By: #330
Blocking:

Description

Generally speaking, within Lumiera Proc-Layer the Assets represent the bookkeeping aspect of things, while the corresponding dynamic aspect is modeled as MObject. But especially with Clips, the similarity of the names turned out to be even confusing for Ichthyo, thus we should think about a more clear naming scheme here.

A possibility would be to rename session::Clip into ClipMO

Explanation: the asset::Clip servers the special purpose to clamp together the multiple media channels forming the channels of a clip, which might be linked together from multiple source media.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by ichthyo

  • Blocked By 330 added

comment:2 Changed 23 months ago by ichthyo

looks more like we'll drop asset::clip entirely

comment:3 Changed 23 months ago by ichthyo

  • Blocked By 150 removed

comment:4 Changed 23 months ago by ichthyo

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to wontfix

Now decided to purge asset::clip. Thus session::Clip becomes "the" clip

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.